News From the World Wide Web, Not the Regular Blog

Conway seeks dismissal of $50 million cell tower suit by NH Business Review for Daymond Steer-The Conway Daily Sun

Conway seeks dismissal of $50 million cell tower suit by NH Business Review for Daymond Steer-The Conway Daily Sun
Jason Dennis

Conway’s town counsel Jason Dennis has filed a motion to dismiss Kevin MacMillan’s lawsuit about the Artist Falls Road cell tower approval. Here Dennis is seen at an unrelated selectmen’s meeting in February 2023. (Photo by Daymond Steer, Conway Daily Sun)

The town is asking a judge to dismiss a $50 million lawsuit that was filed against it over approval of a cell tower off Artist Falls Road.

On Nov. 12. Town Code Enforcement Officer Jeremy Gibbs gave Bear Hill Development of Natick, Mass., a building permit for a wireless communications facility on Artist Falls Road. The permit must be exercised within a year’s time. The tower is estimated at about 160 feet tall.

Artist Falls resident Kevin MacMillan has been fighting the approval since the Zoning Board of Adjustment OK’d the tower in 2021. MacMillan, a builder by trade, built the Sun’s office building in the 1990s.

On Nov. 21, MacMillan, who believes cell towers cause health hazards, filed suit in Carroll County Superior Court seeking $50 million from the town. Since then, the case was moved to Hillsborough County North in Manchester, which is the state’s land use court.

His suit says, in part, that the ZBA accepted “false information of an advertised balloon test from Vertex Towers.” It continues, “The Conway ZBA ignored residents’ concerns on collapse, on fire, on height of tower and radiation hazards as discovered by the National Toxicity Program and the NH Commission on Electromagnetic radiation and the IAFF.”

On Dec. 9, the town’s attorney, Jason Dennis of Hastings Law Office in Fryeburg, Maine, filed a motion to dismiss. It was based on the following:

  •  First, MacMillan didn’t appeal the issuance of the building permit to the Zoning Board of Adjustment. “As such, MacMillan has failed to exhaust his administrative remedies,” said Dennis.  
  •  Second, the fraud claim doesn’t support the point of his lawsuit and lacked specificity weren’t specific enough.
  •  Third, planning board and zoning issues have have been fully litigated at the Superior and New Hampshire Supreme Court.

Dennis cited the Superior Court case of Benjamin Averill, et al v Town of Conway, in which Averill challenged the planing board’s site plan and subdivision approval.

“In this case, because the building permit presents no change from the use/structure that was permitted (and already litigated), Macmillan’s challenge to the issuance of a building permit arises out of the same circumstances and relies on the same facts as did Macmillan’s (and the Averills’) challenge to the original approval of the cell tower back in 2022-23,” said Dennis, adding that state and local governments can’t regulate the location of wireless service facilities based on RF emissions. A scheduling conference will be held today at 8:45 a.m.

MacMillan previously sued the zoning board in Carroll County Superior Court and lost. The state Supreme Court affirmed the Superior Court’s decision in an order dated March, 22, 2023.

One reason why this tower is significant to Conway is selectmen have said that lack of year around cell service is a reason to hold off on implementing paid parking in North Conway Village, as that relies on a cellphone app.

The plan floated a few years ago was to charge $2 per hour during business hours to park in North Conway Village with a pay-by-app system. It was estimated the program could raise about $900,000 annually.  

This article is being shared by partners in the Granite State News Collaborative. For more information, visit collaborativenh.org.

Categories: Law, News
FromAround TheWWW

A curated News Feed from Around the Web dedicated to Real Estate and New Hampshire. This is an automated feed, and the opinions expressed in this feed do not necessarily reflect those of stevebargdill.com.

stevebargdill.com does not offer financial or legal guidance. Opinions expressed by individual authors do not necessarily reflect those of stevebargdill.com. All content, including opinions and services, is informational only, does not guarantee results, and does not constitute an agreement for services. Always seek the guidance of a licensed and reputable financial professional who understands your unique situation before making any financial or legal decisons. Your finacial and legal well-being is important, and professional advince can provide the support and epertise needed to make informed and responsible choices. Any financial decisons or actions taken based on the content of this post are at the sole discretion and risk of the reader.

Leave a Reply