News From the World Wide Web

CFPB sues Experian over ‘sham’ consumer dispute investigations by Flávia Furlan Nunes for HousingWire

HousingWireHousingWire

Experian has become the latest focus of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) as the agency intensifies its regulatory and enforcement activity ahead of the impending White House transition.

On Tuesday, the CFPB filed a lawsuit against Experian in a U.S. district court in California, accusing the credit reporting giant of violating the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) and the Consumer Financial Protection Act (CFPA). 

According to the CFPB, Experian failed to properly investigate consumer disputes, remove errors and prevent inaccurate information from being reinserted into credit reports. These lapses reportedly harmed consumers’ access to credit, employment and housing opportunities, it alleged. 

“When consumers disputed errors on their credit reports, Experian conducted sham investigations rather than properly reviewing the disputes as required by federal law,” CFPB Director Rohit Chopra said in a statement. “Credit reporting errors can have serious consequences for a family’s finances, and it is critical that credit reporting giants follow the law.”

Experian representatives did not immediately respond to HousingWire’s request for comment.

The CFPB alleges that Experian “routinely and uncritically” accepted responses from banks, credit companies and debt collectors on consumer disputes, even when it was “illogical on its face” or unreliable. 

In addition, the consumer watchdog claims Experian withheld consumer-submitted documentation from furnishers that could support dispute claims. Between January 2018 and October 2021, Experian reportedly failed to forward more than 2 million disputes to furnishers within the required five-business-day window, the lawsuit states. 

Experian also failed to inform, or simply provided “confusing, ambiguous, incorrect, or internally inconsistent” information to consumers. In some instances, consumers who believed errors had been resolved saw the same inaccuracies reappear on their credit reports, compounding their financial difficulties.

According to the lawsuit, from February 2019 to February 2020, Experian allegedly deleted over 100,000 disputed tradelines instead of completing required reinvestigations within 30 days. Some of this information was later reinserted into consumer reports. Also, Experian allegedly failed to delete over 1,700 incorrect “joint user” statuses despite requests from furnishers to correct the inaccuracies.

The lawsuit against Experian follows one filed by the CFPB against Vanderbilt Mortgage & Finance, part of Warren Buffett’s conglomerate Berkshire Hathaway. Vanderbilt is accused of manipulating underwriting standards and setting borrowers up to fail in manufactured home loans.

In December, the CFPB also sued Rocket Homes, accusing the company of orchestrating a kickback scheme to funnel business to its sister companies, Rocket Mortgage and Amrock. The Jason Mitchell Group was also named in the alleged violations of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA).

Vanderbilt, Rocket and the Jason Mitchell Group publicly denied the allegations.

FromAround TheWWW

A curated News Feed from Around the Web dedicated to Real Estate and New Hampshire. This is an automated feed, and the opinions expressed in this feed do not necessarily reflect those of stevebargdill.com.

stevebargdill.com does not offer financial or legal guidance. Opinions expressed by individual authors do not necessarily reflect those of stevebargdill.com. All content, including opinions and services, is informational only, does not guarantee results, and does not constitute an agreement for services. Always seek the guidance of a licensed and reputable financial professional who understands your unique situation before making any financial or legal decisons. Your finacial and legal well-being is important, and professional advince can provide the support and epertise needed to make informed and responsible choices. Any financial decisons or actions taken based on the content of this post are at the sole discretion and risk of the reader.

Leave a Reply