News From the World Wide Web

CFPB freezes nonbank registry rule after industry pushback by Flávia Furlan Nunes for HousingWire

HousingWireHousingWire

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) announced on Friday that it’s rescinding a rule from the previous administration that requires nonbank financial services providers to register certain enforcement actions and court orders with a new federal database. The regulation was the target of criticism from the mortgage industry. 

In practice, the CFPB said it will not prioritize enforcement or supervision actions against entities that fail to meet upcoming deadlines, as it pursues a new rulemaking process to either repeal or narrow the existing rule. 

“The bureau will instead continue to focus its enforcement and supervision activities on pressing threats to consumers,” the CFPB said in a statement.

Timeline of change

The proposed rule, introduced in late 2022, requires nonbank entities to report public agency enforcement actions and court orders for inclusion in a nonbank registration system (NBR) – a publicly available online database. The final rule was published in July 2024, with an implementation date of Sept. 16, 2024.

Under the original timeline, smaller nonbanks supervised by the CFPB were required to register by April 14, 2025, with all covered nonbanks expected to comply by July 14, 2025.

The main criticism from mortgage trade groups centered on what they characterized as the rule’s redundancy. Independent mortgage banks (IMBs) already report similar information through the Nationwide Multistate Licensing System and Registry (NMLS).

The NMLS MU1 forms already require IMBs to disclose all state or federal regulatory actions — as well as certain court actions — from the past 10 years. IMBs that fail to comply with NMLS reporting rules are subject to fines.

Industry response

Mortgage trade groups applauded the freeze on the nonbank registry rule.

The Community Home Lenders of America (CHLA), a national non-profit association representing small- and mid-sized community mortgage lenders, said the recent decision provides “regulatory relief for smaller lenders from duplicative Registry requirements.” 

“CHLA called for such action in our February letter to the CFPB, as part of an agenda of regulatory streamlining so mortgage lenders can concentrate on their main business — originating loans,” the trade group said in a statement. 

Another trade group, the Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA), sent a letter to the CFPB in January requesting a delay in the compliance deadlines. At that point, MBA president and CEO Bob Broeksmit attacked the rule, saying it was “costly and duplicative.” 

Regarding the current freezing, MBA’s senior vice president of residential policy and strategic industry engagement, Pete Mills, said in a statement that the CFPB “could have instead added its enforcement information on mortgage companies to the already comprehensive consumer-facing database maintained by the Conference of State Bank Supervisors’ NMLS Consumer Access portal.”

MBA is monitoring the CFPB’s next steps and will advocate for them to consider issuing an NPR to rescind the regulation,” Mills said.

FromAround TheWWW

A curated News Feed from Around the Web dedicated to Real Estate and New Hampshire. This is an automated feed, and the opinions expressed in this feed do not necessarily reflect those of stevebargdill.com.

stevebargdill.com does not offer financial or legal guidance. Opinions expressed by individual authors do not necessarily reflect those of stevebargdill.com. All content, including opinions and services, is informational only, does not guarantee results, and does not constitute an agreement for services. Always seek the guidance of a licensed and reputable financial professional who understands your unique situation before making any financial or legal decisons. Your finacial and legal well-being is important, and professional advince can provide the support and epertise needed to make informed and responsible choices. Any financial decisons or actions taken based on the content of this post are at the sole discretion and risk of the reader.

Leave a Reply